Definition of a field
Let F be a nonempty set with two defined operations for α,β∈F called addition and multiplication.
- addition: α+β∈F
- multiplication: αβ∈F
F is a field iff (if and only if) the operations satisfy the following properties:
A. Axioms for Addition
- Associative property of addition
- for all α,β,γ∈F, (α+β)+γ=α+(β+γ)
- Commutative property of addition
- for all α,β∈F, α+β=β+α
- Existence of an additive identity
- there exists a unique element 0 of F for all α∈F such that α+0=α
- Existence of additive inverses
- for each α∈F, there exists a unique element −α∈F such that α+(−α)=0
B. Axioms for Multiplication
- Associative property of multiplication
- for all α,β,γ∈F, (αβ)γ=α(βγ)
- Commutative property of multiplication
- for all α,β∈F, αβ=βα
- Existence of a multiplicative identity
- there exists a unique nonzero element 1 of F for all α∈F such that α⋅1=α
- Existence of multiplicative inverses
- for each α∈F, α≠0 there exists a unique element α−1∈F with the property that αα−1=1
C. Distributive Axiom
- Distributive property of multiplication over addition
- for all α,β,γ∈F, α(β+γ)=αβ+αγ
Infinite Fields
(Q,+,×)≤(R,+,×)≤(C,+,×)
- Q={nm∣m,n∈Z,m≠0}, the set of all rational numbers
- R = the set of all real numbers
- C={a+bi∣a,b∈R}, the set of all complex numbers
Q. Why are (Z,+,×) and (N,+,×) NOT fields?
- Z=...,−2,−1,0,1,2,..., the set of all integers
- N=1,2,3,..., the set of all natural numbers
A. The set Z of integers violates axiom (B4), the existence of multiplicative inverses; only integers 1 and -1 have multiplicative inverses that are also integers.
For each n∈Z,n≥2 or n≤−2,
|n|>1
⇒0<|1n|<1
⇒1n∉Z
The set of natural numbers N⊂Z is also not a field. It violates axioms (A3), (A4), and (B4).
Basic Properties of Fields
Theorem (Cancellation Properties) Let α,β,γ be elements of field F. Then,
- if α,β,γ∈F and α+γ=β+γ, then α=β
- if α,β,γ∈F,αγ=βγ, and γ≠0, then α=β
PROOF (1)
Given the following statement α+γ=β+γ, Add the additive inverse of γ on both sides: (α+γ)+(−γ)=(β+γ)+(−γ) By associative property, α+(γ+(−γ))=β+(γ+(−γ)) Since we know that γ+(−γ)=0, α+0=β+0 ⇒α=β |
Theorem Let F be a field. Then, for each α∈F,
- 0⋅α=0
- −1⋅α=−α
PROOF (1)
As stated by axiom (A3), 0+α=α Multiply both sides by α: (0+α)α=α⋅α The distributive property yields 0⋅α+α⋅α=α⋅α By cancellation property, 0⋅α=0 |
PROOF (2)
Assume the following statement: α+(−1)⋅α=0 Since α=1⋅α, 1⋅α+(−1)⋅α=0 By distributive property, (1+(−1))α=0 ⇒0⋅α=0 Hence the statement is true and −1⋅α is a unique additive inverse of α, −1⋅α=−α |